[40820] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Ethernet NAPs (was Re: Miami ...)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mikael Abrahamsson)
Thu Aug 23 09:29:14 2001
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 15:28:43 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <9m2pa9$jed$1@ncc1701.cistron.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108231527470.3920-100000@uplift.swm.pp.se>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> So it's simply waiting for a routing vendor that sets the MTU
> per endpoint based on the MSS in the TCP handshake for the
> BGP session.
Or at least where you can somehow specify different MTUs for different IPs
within a subnet. Then that could be a part of any BGP peer setup that you
also include the MTU you can handle.
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se
