|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 12:57:19 -0400 (EDT) From: Greg Maxwell <gmaxwell@martin.fl.us> To: Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org> Cc: "'nanog@merit.edu'" <nanog@merit.edu> In-Reply-To: <20010816125127.A95509@ussenterprise.ufp.org> Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0108161256150.21079-100000@da1server.martin.fl.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, Leo Bicknell wrote: > 802.11a might do what you need. Not sure if it has been standardized > yet, but if not there are a number of proprietary implementations > in the same speed range. It promises 50Mbps with similar properties > to 802.11b. > > 20 miles is going to be a long throw, but not outside the range of > possibilities if you have line of site and good rooftop acesss. You > will need some big antennas though. A site in the middle making it > 2 10 meg shots would be ideal. FCC Part 15.247 limits EIRP. You can't legally put out enough power in the unlicenced bands.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |