|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Message-ID: <DDF5392E0FB3D41196C10008C7D9AE5D05E00EF9@STLABCEXG022> From: "Young, Jason" <Jason.Young@anheuser-busch.com> To: "'Cerqua, Toby'" <toby@platinumsystems.net>, "'nanog@merit.edu'" <nanog@merit.edu> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 11:13:24 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu cheap/fast/good. Pick two. I don't know that you can get that kind of speed from satellite. If you could get that kind of range from point-to-point wireless at that speed, you'd certainly need a good line of sight. Do you have that? You should see if this data is reasonably compressible. Maybe your bandwidth needs aren't as bad as you think. Jason Young CNS - Network Design, Anheuser-Busch (314)577-4597 > -----Original Message----- > From: Cerqua, Toby [mailto:toby@platinumsystems.net] > Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 11:02 AM > To: 'nanog@merit.edu' > Subject: wanted: wireless magic tricks > > > > hey all, > > we've got a client that wants some crazy stuff, and i need either > suggestions or confirmation that this is impossible/too expensive. > > client needs 45Mbps pushed over 20 miles... and he wants it > wireless. the > kicker is that they don't want a T3 because it is "too > expensive" and it > would take too long to get installed. it doesn't need to be > constant, but he > wants to move of 2.5GB within 45 minutes. this is in the > chicago area, if > that helps any. so, i don't know, satellite? > > - toby > ----------------------------------------------- > t@platinumsystems.net > http://www.platinumsystems.net >
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |