[4065] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Hey, anyone who wanna help improve the net stability?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Geoff Huston)
Thu Sep 5 17:06:08 1996
From: Geoff Huston <gih@aarnet.edu.au>
To: erik-jan.bos@surfnet.nl (Erik-Jan Bos)
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 1996 06:45:01 +1000 (EST)
Cc: freedman@netaxs.com, cook@netaxs.com, vixie@wisdom.home.vix.com,
nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <19317.841953533@surfnet.nl> from "Erik-Jan Bos" at Sep 5, 96 09:58:53 pm
Erik-Jan
You were plotting the size of the routing table at very tight
intervals (1 hour or so as I recall) - are these graphs online
somewhere?
geoff
>
> Avi,
>
> > It's not necessarily unaggregated...
> >
> > I'm not sure, it's possible that Sean might have described the swamp as
> > basically space above the a/b space and < 205/8.
>
> At the Los Angeles IETF I tried to define the terms "Swamp" and "Toxic
> Waste Dump" as follows:
> * The Swamp is the 192.0.0.0/8 addres space that is routed.
> * Each and every /24 in the Swamp is part of the Toxic Waste Dump (twd).
>
> > > Of the class cs from the swamp how many are now being routed at the
> > > defaultless core? HOW MANY ADDITIONAL CLASS Cs FROM THE SWAMP ARE THERE
> >
> > No clue, but we could find out.
>
> You might not like/agree/understand the above definitions, but... given
> the above definitions the current sizes are:
>
> Size(swamp) = 6549
> Size(twd) = 5555
>
> This data is taken from a default free router that lives in Amsterdam,
> The Netherlands which has 40590 prefixes at this moment.
>
> FYI.
>
> __
>
> Erik-Jan.
>
>
