[40478] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: NetSol takes over .us TLD and does this
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (up@3.am)
Thu Aug 9 22:48:17 2001
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 22:46:07 -0400 (EDT)
From: <up@3.am>
To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <EA9368A5B1010140ADBF534E4D32C728025AFF@condor.mhsc.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10108092244260.5235-100000@richard2.pil.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
I thought the .us whois not working was fairly recent news...at least it
worked a few weeks ago.
On Thu, 9 Aug 2001, Roeland Meyer wrote:
>
> Duh! You haven't been keeping up. ICANN/DNSO/GA knew about this *months*
> ago. In fact, there is an RFP out for managing US. There's problems with the
> contract though, so there aren't many bidders. US is a royal mess that many
> don't want to touch.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: up@3.am [mailto:up@3.am]
> > Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 5:41 PM
> > To: nanog@merit.edu
> > Subject: NetSol takes over .us TLD and does this
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I thought this might be of interest:
> >
> > The whois for .us had been working a few weeks ago, but
> > hadn't been since
> > then. I dropped an email to action@isi.edu (who had been hosting the
> > whois server until a few weeks ago) and cc'd usdomreg@nic.us
> > and got the
> > following responses:
> >
> > Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2001 12:21:22 -0700
> > From: IPC Computing Services <action@ISI.EDU>
> > To: James Smallacombe <james@pil.net>
> > Cc: action@ISI.EDU, action-team@ISI.EDU
> > Subject: Re: {2001.08.445} .us TLD whois not in DNS
> >
> >
> > > http://www.nic.us/register/whois.html
> > >
> > > Instructs one to use whois.isi.edu
> > >
> > > for whois queries on the .us TLD. It's not in DNS:
> > >
> > > [richard namedb james]$ traceroute whois.isi.edu
> > > traceroute: unknown host whois.isi.edu
> > >
> > > Could you please look into this and let me know if either
> > the website
> > > is wrong or this will be fixed?
> >
> >
> > At the request of the US Department of Commerce, USC/ISI transitioned
> > all support for the US Domain to Verisign at the end of 2000. We
> > appologize that the Verisign supported web site still points to
> > USC/ISI resources but we have no control over their publication of
> > data.
> >
> > IPC Computing Services
> >
> > -------
> > 31 hours later from the new registrar (Verisign):
> >
> > Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2001 19:27:10 -0400
> > From: US domreg <usdomreg@nic.us>
> > To: James Smallacombe <james@pil.net>
> > Cc: usreply@nic.us
> > Subject: Re: .us TLD whois not in DNS
> >
> >
> > Dear James,
> >
> > Thank you for contacting the US Domain Registry.
> >
> > The whois database was run by ISI until recently. The whois
> > server has
> > now
> > been taken offline and so there is no .us whois server
> > currently. We are
> > currently working on a replacement but there is no estimate
> > on how long
> > that
> > will take. In the meantime, if there are specific domains you wish to
> > have
> > information on, please email them to us and we will manually find the
> > information for you.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > US Domain Registry
> > www.nic.us
> > usdomreg@nic.us
> >
> > ==============================================================
> > =================
> >
> >
> > ok, so .us isn't very widely used, but why then, did the DOC
> > give it to
> > Verisign?
> >
> > James Smallacombe PlantageNet, Inc. CEO and Janitor
> > up@3.am
> http://3.am
> =========================================================================
>
James Smallacombe PlantageNet, Inc. CEO and Janitor
up@3.am http://3.am
=========================================================================
