[40456] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: SP's & network security issues (partII)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher A. Woodfield)
Thu Aug 9 13:24:44 2001
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 13:24:31 -0400
To: Christian Kuhtz <ck@arch.bellsouth.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Message-ID: <20010809132431.B20909@semihuman.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20010809003959.H18551@ns1.arch.bellsouth.net>
From: "Christopher A. Woodfield" <rekoil@semihuman.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
@home started scanning their customers for open NNTP proxies (mostly
machines running misconfigured WinGate proxies) after they came >< close
to getting UDP'ed. Their response to Code Red seems to have been
limited to blocking port 80 to their cable modem customers (running a web
server on a cable modem is a violation of their AUP, but until now it was
only enforced in egregious cases).
-C
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 12:39:59AM -0400, Christian Kuhtz wrote:
>
>
> Another couple of points...
>
> Do you guys scan your customers? If so, what for? OS scans? Specific
> threats? Infections? How do you handle this in your AUP? Have you had
> problems with it? What sort of problems have you had and how did you handle
> them?
>
> How do you guys deal with NIDS at multi-Gbps rates?
>
> --
> Christian Kuhtz <ck@arch.bellsouth.net> -wk, <ck@gnu.org> -hm
> Sr. Architect, Engineering & Architecture, BellSouth.net, Atlanta, GA, U.S.
> "I speak for myself only."
--
---------------------------
Christopher A. Woodfield rekoil@semihuman.com
PGP Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xB887618B
