[40372] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: MPLS VPNs or not?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christian Kuhtz)
Tue Aug 7 23:29:46 2001
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2001 23:29:02 -0400
From: Christian Kuhtz <ck@arch.bellsouth.net>
To: Vadim Antonov <avg@exigengroup.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20010807232902.V18551@ns1.arch.bellsouth.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10108071820430.29904-100000@arch.exigengroup.com>; from Vadim Antonov on Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 06:25:50PM -0700
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 06:25:50PM -0700, Vadim Antonov wrote:
>
> The point is very simple - virtual circuit routing does not scale. That
> was beaten to death in ATM vs IP discussions years ago.
What does this have to do with VC routing?! And tunnels are probably closer to
VC routing than 2547(bis) style VPNs. What is your point?
--
Christian Kuhtz <ck@arch.bellsouth.net> -wk, <ck@gnu.org> -hm
Sr. Architect, Engineering & Architecture, BellSouth.net, Atlanta, GA, U.S.
"I speak for myself only."
