![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 1996 13:16:32 -0400 (EDT) From: Robert Gibson <wa3pxx@cais.cais.com> To: Peter Lothberg <roll@Stupi.SE> cc: nanog@merit.edu In-Reply-To: <CMM.0.90.0.841927877.roll@Junk.Stupi.SE> Peter, Is there a way we can help? We are doing what we can to aggregate. Bob On Thu, 5 Sep 1996, Peter Lothberg wrote: > > > Hey all! > > We are approaching 40K routes, and this seems to make IBGP in networks > with rich external connectivity pretty unhappy. > > Without pointing fingers, there are some 9K prefixes that could be > removed by proper aggregation/reconfiguration. > > ICM-Stockholm-2#sh ip bgp summ > BGP table version is 526856, main routing table version 526856 > 39321 network entries (300167/309954 paths) using 13491704 bytes of memory > > > I suggest that everyon go look at what they can do, as we are all > loosers with the currect situation. > > --Peter >
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |