[40320] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: MPLS VPNs or not?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Andy Walden)
Tue Aug 7 10:06:41 2001
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2001 09:03:53 -0500 (CDT)
From: Andy Walden <andy@tigerteam.net>
To: Christian Kuhtz <ck@arch.bellsouth.net>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20010807095620.G18551@ns1.arch.bellsouth.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108070857420.26255-100000@vision.tigerteam.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Tue, 7 Aug 2001, Christian Kuhtz wrote:
>
> I think it's pretty well known that the point you mention is FUD. Besides,
> it's not really intended to be 'multiple tables' with multiple instances of
> routing processes.. it's an indexed table run by the same routing process.
Logic says that not seeing the routes at all, a la layer-2 tunnels, is
going to scale *better* then having your routers deal with them at all.
Less routes/resources=greater scalability.
andy
