[40279] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IP address blocks for out-of-band inter-provider links
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com)
Mon Aug 6 05:40:33 2001
From: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
Message-Id: <200108061003.KAA09284@vacation.karoshi.com>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2001 10:03:48 +0000 (UCT)
Cc: sean@donelan.com (Sean Donelan), nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <200108060757.f767vDv25413@foo-bar-baz.cc.vt.edu> from "Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu" at Aug 06, 2001 03:57:12 AM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Well, it sure looks like a "virtual" exchange to me.
>
>
> --==_Exmh_1734063872P
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> On Sun, 05 Aug 2001 22:44:22 PDT, Sean Donelan <sean@donelan.com> said:
>
> > Because this isn't supposed to be connected to the Internet, its not
> > necessary to use IANA/ARIN/RIPE/APNIC assigned IP address blocks. Several
> > providers use private addresses on their out-of-band management networks.
> > I would prefer to use globally unique IP addresses between providers to
> > avoid conflicts with the RFC1918 private addresses already in use in
> > provider's networks, and if the addresses accidently leak.
>
> But of course, all the people involved have their border routers configured
> to do proper egress filtering of 1918 addresses, so they won't leak very far ;)
>
> Having said that, you can probably make the case that you're building a
> "virtual" exchange point, and ask for some address space for that?
>
>
> --
> Valdis Kletnieks
> Operating Systems Analyst
> Virginia Tech
>
>
>
> --==_Exmh_1734063872P
> Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGP 6.5.8
> Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/09/2001
>
> iQA/AwUBO25N2HAt5Vm009ewEQLy2QCfUzHW7M92bBuMqgkvFSF6dfcsx+sAoODO
> NHz105yV3XzvFpPhbnuNn9AB
> =3aeS
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> --==_Exmh_1734063872P--
>
