[40236] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Code Red Hammering Away

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (michael@aplatform.com)
Sat Aug 4 16:19:42 2001

Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2001 13:18:20 -0700 (PDT)
From: <michael@aplatform.com>
To: Etaoin Shrdlu <shrdlu@deaddrop.org>
Cc: Nanog <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <3B6C55B9.D823A70C@deaddrop.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108041317040.3440-100000@aplatform.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


Hello Etaoin,

On Sat, 4 Aug 2001, Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:

>
> Yes, it's true, I fixed the attribution. Young whippersnappers!
>
> michael@aplatform.com wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 4 Aug 2001, Lou Katz wrote:
>
> > > My little Class C seems to be getting 3-6 attempts per second to
> > > connect to Port 80 on various IPs at the present time. Is this
> > > about average?
>
> > Its more than what I am getting.  Never the less since this started again
> > im seeing alot more attempts than in July.
>
> I see about 300% more attempts than in July, but close to one-third of
> those do not appear to be code red. They seem to be what I would have
> suspected. People trying to mask attempts under the noise of code red.
> Nonetheless, it is getting annoying enough that I am close to moving all
> the windoze machines off to a private switched network until this is over.

I can see they are "valid" CR attempts..

>
> No, I'm not afraid of them being compromised, but some of them do seem to
> be getting hit harder than the rest of my computers. What I don't
> understand is why my openbsd laptop attracts so much attention.
>
> Uname -a shows OpenBSD scorpion 2.6 GENERIC#696 i386, hardly an attractive
> target for code red in my book. No, it's not running a web server. The only
> service it actually offers is sshd.
>
> At first it was interesting, then annoying, now it's just boring. Most of
> the non-code red attempts I see are from apnic, for what that's worth.
>
> --
> You've confused equality of opportunity for equality of outcomes,
> and have seriously confused justice with equality.
>                                 -- Woodchuck
>


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post