[40129] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: MicroSoft amplification?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Thu Aug 2 00:50:33 2001
Message-Id: <200108020449.f724nuw17959@foo-bar-baz.cc.vt.edu>
To: Tony Rall <trall@almaden.ibm.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 01 Aug 2001 16:26:55 PDT."
<OF3DD9155A.FA5F9232-ON88256A9B.00804F54@almaden.ibm.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2001 00:49:56 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Wed, 01 Aug 2001 16:26:55 PDT, Tony Rall <trall@almaden.ibm.com> said:
> echo). This probably makes PMTUD work a lot better, but it sucks for ICMP
Or totally horques it up entirely if the actual data path used has a
different PMTU. No way this will work if 9 paths are clean and one
requires a frag. ;)
I won't discuss what to do if you get back 10 FRAG NEEDED packets, with
differing frag sizes ;)
/Valdis
