[4005] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Agenda for next NANOG

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (bmanning@isi.edu)
Tue Sep 3 21:58:19 1996

From: bmanning@isi.edu
To: peterf@microsoft.com (Peter Ford)
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 1996 18:45:12 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: randy@psg.com, dorian@cic.net, jjs@sprint.net, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <c=US%a=_%p=msft%l=RED-69-MSG-960904011710Z-25177@tide19.microsoft.com> from "Peter Ford" at Sep 3, 96 06:17:10 pm

> 
> 
> 
> Looking at it strictly from a technical level, there is little difference 
> between a private interconnect and the connection between an ISP and  their 
> upstream provider if they have one.   (we might consider debating this 
> assumption especially in terms of scale :-))
> 

	Actually, the traditional point2point link between any
	two ISPs is a private interconnect.  It does not have to
	be a provider/subscriber relationship. 

--bill

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post