[40044] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: telnet vs ssh on Core equipment , looking for reasons why ?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Gary E. Miller)
Tue Jul 31 14:12:07 2001
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 11:11:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Gary E. Miller" <gem@rellim.com>
To: <up@3.am>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10107311040240.72706-100000@richard2.pil.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107311110220.17961-100000@catbert.rellim.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Yo Up!
On Tue, 31 Jul 2001 up@3.am wrote:
> if this is done, you may well already be f*cked, but not neccessarily
> because of "sniffing" or "injecting ARP entries", all of which can be
> prevented by a decent switch with VLANs, and for more protection, static
> port ARP entries.
Many switchs will fail open when flooded. I have used this to bypass
VLAN protection.
RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 20340 Empire Ave, Suite E-3, Bend, OR 97701
gem@rellim.com Tel:+1(541)382-8588 Fax: +1(541)382-8676
