[40027] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: telnet vs ssh on Core equipment , looking for reasons why ?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mr. James W. Laferriere)
Tue Jul 31 11:25:00 2001
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 11:24:31 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Mr. James W. Laferriere" <babydr@baby-dragons.com>
To: <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107310918320.5781-100000@filesrv1.baby-dragons.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107311117140.5781-100000@filesrv1.baby-dragons.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Hello All , Thank you for the disertations & insight into the
possible methods of compromising an authentication attempt .
But , I am really interested more in 'Why' each responsible
indidvual(s) chose either telnet or ssh to manager their Core
equipment .
ssh
1 ) Has been the encrypted authentication .
telnet
1 ) Has been legacy OS's / Equipment olny supporting telnet .
On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
> Hello All , I have charged myself with trying to find a statistic
> on how many individuals responsible for IP core equipment
> recommend telnet or ssh & why particularly . I will summarize .
Tia , JimL
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
| James W. Laferriere | System Techniques | Give me VMS |
| Network Engineer | P.O. Box 854 | Give me Linux |
| babydr@baby-dragons.com | Coudersport PA 16915 | only on AXP |
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
