[40011] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: telnet vs ssh on Core equipment , looking for reasons why ?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ariel Biener)
Tue Jul 31 10:07:22 2001
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 16:57:37 +0300 (IDT)
From: Ariel Biener <ariel@fireball.tau.ac.il>
To: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve@opaltelecom.co.uk>
Cc: fingers <fingers@fingers.co.za>,
"Mr. James W. Laferriere" <babydr@baby-dragons.com>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0107311448150.23776-100000@staff.opaltelecom.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21_heb2.09.0107311657010.1792-100000@fireball.tau.ac.il>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
> paranoia on people sniffing tho!
Hmmm, how about I inject an arp entry into your workstation, and redirect
your traffic to where I want ?
...
--Ariel
>
> Steve
>
> On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, fingers wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > > Hello All ,I have charged myself with trying to find a statistic
> > > on how many individuals responsible for IP core equipment
> > > recommend telnet or ssh & why particularly .I will summarize .
> >
> > telnet is cleartext, that should be reason enough...
> >
> > --Rob
> >
> >
>
> --
> Stephen J. Wilcox
> IP Services Manager, Opal Telecom
> http://www.opaltelecom.co.uk/
> Tel: 0161 222 2000
> Fax: 0161 222 2008
>
--
Ariel Biener
e-mail: ariel@post.tau.ac.il
PGP(6.5.8) public key http://www.tau.ac.il/~ariel/pgp.html
