[40000] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Hard data on network impact of the "Code Red" worm?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Tue Jul 31 02:34:11 2001
Message-Id: <200107310633.f6V6XOw21372@foo-bar-baz.cc.vt.edu>
To: Hank Nussbacher <hank@att.net.il>
Cc: Sean Donelan <sean@donelan.com>, ck@arch.bellsouth.net,
nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 31 Jul 2001 08:40:48 +0200."
<4.3.2.7.2.20010731082904.00ab1550@max.att.net.il>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_-1609310062P";
micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 02:33:24 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_-1609310062P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Tue, 31 Jul 2001 08:40:48 +0200, Hank Nussbacher said:
> In this case, IMO, the hype was warranted. If not for the 2 code errors in
> Code Red, this worm, using 300K zombies at 50Mb/sec each would have hit the
> Internet with about 15Tb/sec of aggregate traffic. The next time, we all
> won't be so lucky.
Umm.. Urp.
You think all those 300K zombies have 100baseT?
I don';t think any of the 48 victims at our site had it.
--
Valdis Kletnieks
Operating Systems Analyst
Virginia Tech
--==_Exmh_-1609310062P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/09/2001
iQA/AwUBO2ZRM3At5Vm009ewEQLvJwCfep0PJfchD1GP6fAokDA9A5Omv3EAoPWV
y/ZqE6T78bnOLxO+65xvlID+
=Or79
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_-1609310062P--
