[39919] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NAP History (was RE: The large ISPs and Peering)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nipper, Arnold)
Thu Jul 26 12:38:49 2001
Message-ID: <035a01c115f1$76df6ca0$01000001@nipper.de>
From: "Nipper, Arnold" <arnold@nipper.de>
To: <nanog@merit.edu>, "Sean Donelan" <sean@donelan.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 18:38:55 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Sean Donelan schrieb:
> exchange points. Some of the additional exchange points have grown very
> large, such as CIX, MAE-West, LINX, AMS-IX, even though they didn't have
> NSF's "stamp of approval."
>
Why should LINX, AMS-IX, DE-CIX or any other European IXP need NSF's "stamp
of approval"?
--Arnold
