[39875] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Discovering AS Path confederation...

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Vijay Gill)
Wed Jul 25 17:42:09 2001

Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 17:41:38 -0400
From: Vijay Gill <vijay@umbc.edu>
To: Chris Rapier <rapier@psc.edu>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <3B5F322B.4364057E@psc.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.4.31L.02.0107251737320.13929-100000@irix2.gl.umbc.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


On Wed, 25 Jul 2001, Chris Rapier wrote:

> I can say the observed divergence corresponds to this previously seen
> path. E.g.... I run a trace and find it traverses 701 702 8414 2912 7262
> 101 while the route table indicates its path should be 701 7262 101. If
> I know that 701 is confederating 8414 and 2912 then I know that the
> actual path corresponds to the routing table. However, I first need to
> determine that UUnet if actually doing that.

I think you're confusing confederations with something else entirely. For
example, the confederated paths are not visible outside a confederated AS.
Eg, some paths will show up like 1 2 3 4 5 6

and 2 may have an internal as path of (65518 655025 655123 23) but for all
intents and purposes, the internal structure of 2 is completely opaque to
entities not in the same AS.

/vijay



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post