|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Message-Id: <200107251859.f6PIxxP20573@foo-bar-baz.cc.vt.edu>
To: David Shaw <dshaw@jabberwocky.com>
Cc: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>, "'k claffy'" <kc@ipn.caida.org>,
nanog@nanog.org, caida@caida.org
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 25 Jul 2001 14:45:44 EDT."
<20010725144544.A1975@akamai.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1838209278P";
micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 14:59:59 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_1838209278P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Wed, 25 Jul 2001 14:45:44 EDT, David Shaw said:
> telnetd is not inherently bad. It is a tool that is lacking the
> session encryption and strong authentication features of SSH, but is
See RFCs 2941 through 2953. Just because your telnetd doesn't implement
it doesn't mean it's not available.
Having said that, I still use ssh for most stuff. ;)
--
Valdis Kletnieks
Operating Systems Analyst
Virginia Tech
--==_Exmh_1838209278P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/09/2001
iQA/AwUBO18XL3At5Vm009ewEQK87ACglmleQpQFBR9eUGOOI+vhWrPzEUYAoNWS
qAGcCrpfIGxJI6tq1v1hpKl6
=J4/c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1838209278P--
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |