[39730] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: Update: CSX train derailment

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (up@3.am)
Sat Jul 21 12:54:29 2001

Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 12:50:25 -0400 (EDT)
From: <up@3.am>
To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <E15Nzuz-000Lwa-00@rip.psg.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10107211248490.73214-100000@richard2.pil.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


On Sat, 21 Jul 2001, Randy Bush wrote:

> > I would think that if fiber can be run across oceans without using tunnels
> > or bridges, that it could be run across some rivers much the same way, no?
> 
> the biggest exposure to cut for wet fiber is shallow water.  anchors,
> idiots, ...

Yes, I can see that; but I imagine you could handle this much the way
fiber is handled near the shoreline.  Bury it a few feet under the mud or
sand.

James Smallacombe		      PlantageNet, Inc. CEO and Janitor
up@3.am							    http://3.am
=========================================================================


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post