[3965] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Agenda for next NANOG
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Curtis Villamizar)
Sat Aug 31 00:43:14 1996
To: "Dorian R. Kim" <dorian@cic.net>
cc: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, "Jim J. Steinhard" <jjs@sprint.net>,
nanog@merit.edu
Reply-To: curtis@ans.net
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 30 Aug 1996 20:25:18 EDT."
<Pine.SOL.3.95.960830201535.15619K-100000@nic.hq.cic.net>
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 1996 00:29:53 -0400
From: Curtis Villamizar <curtis@ans.net>
In message <Pine.SOL.3.95.960830201535.15619K-100000@nic.hq.cic.net>, "Dorian R
. Kim" writes:
> On Fri, 30 Aug 1996, Randy Bush wrote:
>
> > Maybe it is time to get real metrics and real measurements of the different
> > pieces, so we can see where things are fine, where we have current problems
> ,
> > and where problems could be in the future.
>
> This goes beyond just public interconnects. If you are one level removed from
> NSP level, the status and performance of private interconnects between variou
> s
> NSPs become a subject of great deal of interest.
>
> Here, the general dearth of information about performance and status gets eve
> n
> worse than it is with public exchange points.
>
> I wonder if this is something involved parties (MCI, Sprint, UUNet and ANS)
> are willing to talk about, given that I've noticed some degradation on
> performance across some of these private interconnects already.. (and it's
> only been couple of months since they came online!)
>
> I understand that these are private arrangements between involved parties, bu
> t
> given their importance, it would be a great service to the community if the
> involved parties could share some information.
>
> -dorian
Dorian,
I think your best bet is to run NPD. btw- Did you look at the NetNow
stats while they were still up?
Someone from Merit? Why were these stats removed?
Curtis
