[39554] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: When will 128M not be enough?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nipper, Arnold)
Sat Jul 14 12:03:51 2001
Message-ID: <001801c10c7e$819765c0$0190a8c0@nipper.de>
From: "Nipper, Arnold" <arnold@nipper.de>
To: <up@3.am>, "Christopher A. Woodfield" <rekoil@semihuman.com>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2001 18:03:18 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
up@3.am schrieb:
>
> It looks like some recent aggregation has been helping to slow down the
> growth.
If you look at some figures (e.g.
http://www.employees.org/~tbates/cidr-report.html) it's even pretty stable
around 101K prefixes.
128M should do if you only have two or three upstreams, soft reconfiguration
disabled and almost nothing else enabled. Does anyone have experience with
zebra/mrt/... as a route server?. I need one and would like to you for the
cheap server based solution instead of having to buy a fully fledged router.
TIA
-- Arnold
