[39548] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Cisco's connected->bgp redistribution
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Me)
Fri Jul 13 16:41:21 2001
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 14:30:16 -0600 (MDT)
From: Me <smentzer@mentzer.org>
To: <alex@yuriev.com>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1010713163043.11405c-100000@cathy.uuworld.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107131429270.2654-100000@localhost.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
perhaps you have uncovered a bug or something then, as I have never seen a
cisco do that...
--
-sean
Spoon!
On Fri, 13 Jul 2001 alex@yuriev.com wrote:
> Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 16:31:15 -0400 (EDT)
> From: alex@yuriev.com
> To: Dave Israel <davei@biohazard.demon.digex.net>
> Cc: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: Re: Cisco's connected->bgp redistribution
>
>
> >
> >
> > Alex,
> >
> > Make sure you don't have "auto-summary" turned on. Auto-summary
> > is always classful, and therefore nearly always evil.
>
> We never do auto-summary
>
> Thanks,
> Alex
>
> >
> > -Dave
> >
> > On 7/13/2001 at 16:20:40 -0400, alex@yuriev.com said:
> > >
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > > Can anyone shed some light on why cisco ignores "ip classless" when
> > > redistributing classless connected routes into bgp, making things such as
> > > /30 into /24s?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Alex
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Dave Israel
> > Senior Manager, IP Backbone
> > Intermedia Business Internet
> >
> >
>
>
