[39425] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Building NOCs
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dennis Dayman)
Fri Jul 6 18:55:42 2001
From: "Dennis Dayman" <dennis@thenose.net>
To: "Nanog" <nanog@merit.edu>
Cc: "Timothy Brown" <timothy.brown@pobox.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 17:55:18 -0500
Message-ID: <NEBBICNDEPKGKIGNHIBLAENNDJAA.dennis@thenose.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <20010706153817.A13122@gwyn.tux.org>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Try http://www.nocbuilder.com. This is a company created by several NOC
managers/directors.
---------------------------
Dennis Dayman
dennis@thenose.net
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
What goes up, must come down. Ask any system administrator.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> Hi NANOG, hope everyone had a great July 4th.
>
> Our operation is at a stage where it's time to really invest some money in
> building a classy network operations facility. Our data center functions
> are handled seperately, so at this time, this is merely a place for
> housing operations staff. I've searched the cctec archives and
> found a few
> really old threads regarding how to tackle the NOC building process.
> We're a systems house, but I imagine the principles exist along the same
> lines.
>
> Obviously, some of the principles from building data centers apply here -
> i'm not totally out of my depth. I've thought about things like lighting,
> ergonomics, information sources, phones, power, environmental, etc. What
> i'm really looking for from the community are a) links to manufacturers
> of good NOC gear, b) recommendations on the above, and c) financial
> worksheets detailing cost proposals, if any. In addition, any contractor
> suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
>
> When I say NOC gear, what I really mean is NOC furniture, large
> information
> displays, and guidance/standards on how to build facilities. It's been
> a long time since i've done this sort of thing on any kind of a serious
> level.
>
> Since I know that some of the information i'm requesting is proprietary,
> feel free to eliminate the names of the accused and reply
> privately off-list.
> I'll summarize if it looks necessary.
>
> Thanks,
> Tim
