[39416] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: High speed access
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Andrew Brown)
Fri Jul 6 09:54:04 2001
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 09:53:19 -0400
From: Andrew Brown <twofsonet@graffiti.com>
To: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>
Cc: "'Larry Diffey'" <ldiffey@technologyforward.com>, nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20010706095319.A14675@noc.untraceable.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <EA9368A5B1010140ADBF534E4D32C7280259C8@condor.mhsc.com>; from rmeyer@mhsc.com on Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 03:32:07PM -0700
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
>At one time, PacBell almost had 10Mbps to the home (HFC). Yes, it was
>asymetric. ATT/TCI brings such speed. 802.11b carriers (Sprint, et al) are
>trying to bring in symetric 11 Mbps. The we have the local telcos where
>affordability seems to top out at T1 speeds (1.54Mbps). SDSL seems to top
>out there as well.
i've got a cable modem. it beats the pants of dialup service, which
only just before had had it's pants beaten off by my ricochet modem
(which still works, by the way). i'm investigating 802.11b stuff for
my house.
symetric 11 Mbps sounds...goofy. especially if based on 802.11b,
which utilizes a broadcast mechanism. besides, i've yet to meet
*anyone* who got past about 2/3 of the theoretical "bandwidth" of
802.11b. imho, it's the spinal tap of the networking era (it "goes to
11", but is actually just a rumor and sort of made up).
--
|-----< "CODE WARRIOR" >-----|
codewarrior@daemon.org * "ah! i see you have the internet
twofsonet@graffiti.com (Andrew Brown) that goes *ping*!"
andrew@crossbar.com * "information is power -- share the wealth."
