[39372] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: SWIP update intervals (was: Re: Getting an AS and /18)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (up@3.am)
Tue Jul 3 18:04:11 2001
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 18:03:40 -0400 (EDT)
From: <up@3.am>
To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <200107032035.f63KZpw32465@foo-bar-baz.cc.vt.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10107031801400.47675-100000@richard2.pil.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Tue, 3 Jul 2001 Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Jul 2001 16:21:36 EDT, Mitch Halmu said:
>
> > You mean spammers are so stupid as not to know that spamming a network
> > POC is the quickest way to account oblivion? If anything, I thought they
> > weed out such addresses from their lists...
>
> There's a lot of spammers out there that just fell out of a tree and haven't
> learned that 'ietf@ietf.org' is not a good target... ;)
I long ago concluded that this was out of sheer spite...I've only just
recently started wondering if this has anything to do with Mexican
Trucks... :)
James Smallacombe PlantageNet, Inc. CEO and Janitor
up@3.am http://3.am
=========================================================================
