[39363] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: SWIP update intervals (was: Re: Getting an AS and /18)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joe Provo)
Tue Jul 3 16:22:27 2001
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 16:21:55 -0400
From: Joe Provo <joe.provo@rcn.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20010703162154.A60213@ultra.net>
Reply-To: joe.provo@rcn.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <p05101000b767bdcaf2ba@[209.207.60.21]>; from jtk@titania.net on Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 06:23:30PM +0000
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 06:23:30PM +0000, Joseph T. Klein wrote:
[snip]
> What IS going on with rwhois? I heard some talk at the SF ARIN meeting
> about enhancing the rwhois code and making it more workable for ISPs.
> IMHO - SWIP is a generally inferior system ... at least to the potential
> of using rwhois. The real leverage comes if it can be integrated into
> larger distributed database systems.
[snip]
Traffic on the DBWG list is light (I'm just as guilty of not enough time
as other people on the list). The last thread involved making the ARIN
IRR actually useful, swip/whois/IRR-like models, etc. I'd encourage
those of us in the ARIN region to be involved in makingthe wheezing
steam-engines better. http://www.arin.net/governance/workgroups.htm#da
says:
"The Database Implementation Working Group was formed to discuss problems
with existing database systems and how to address them."
Cheers,
Joe
--
Joe Provo Voice 508.486.7471
Director, Internet Planning & Design Fax 508.229.2375
Network Deployment & Management, RCN <joe.provo@rcn.com>
