[39300] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: ISP contracts and government intervention

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mitch Halmu)
Mon Jul 2 10:47:31 2001

Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 10:41:56 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mitch Halmu <mitch@netside.net>
To: Daniel Golding <dan@netrail.net>
Cc: ethanpreston@hushmail.com, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <CKEOJFLLKMIPKODCKHKLEEJJCBAA.dan@netrail.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.1010702103550.2647X-100000@sunny.netside.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu



On Mon, 2 Jul 2001, Daniel Golding wrote:

> "blackhat" seems a strong term for an ISP that wishes to operate without
> government interference.
> 
> ("hats" are for hackers. I don't think you'll find many folks who wear such
> figurative headgear on NANOG)

Some black hats illustrated here:

http://www.dotcomeon.com/blackholed.html

--Mitch
NetSide

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post