[3925] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: MFS WorldCom/WilTel/LDDS
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Vadim Antonov)
Thu Aug 29 04:57:30 1996
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 1996 01:47:38 -0700
From: Vadim Antonov <avg@quake.net>
To: ed@texas.net, hank@ibm.net.il, jerry@fc.net
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Hank Nussbacher <hank@ibm.net.il> wrote:
>> To be more precise it would have had merit if Internet
>> metering was at least remotely technically feasible.
>IBM Israel has been handling its leased line and Web sites
>with metering since day 1.
There seems to be a massive confusiuon here. What isn't
feasible is end-to-end telco-style metering, which is what
those articles all about. (Actually, anybody who ever made
international calls knows that telcos also cannot do complete
metering and simply ignore load on in-country circuits).
Metering on customer access lines does not change economics
of backbones at all (where all the real hard problems are).
In other words, the access line metering is irrelevant to
what is discussed.
Generally speaking, at least 70% of users already have metered
access of that kind (in form of per-hour connect time charges),
so in this sense Internet is metered already, and was like that
for years. Obviously that's not "metering" Metcalfe et al
are calling for.
(BTW, i know providers who do attempt to charge differently
for local and international traffic by counting packets,
but they have developed quite a lot of software and have the
financial and legal framework to support it. The fact that
they don't have anything faster than E-1 helps a lot, too.)
--vadim
