[39243] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Open Peers at PAIX
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Daniel Golding)
Fri Jun 29 12:58:12 2001
From: "Daniel Golding" <dan@netrail.net>
To: "Pete Kruckenberg" <pete@kruckenberg.com>, <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 12:58:03 -0400
Message-ID: <FHEBKELAPEKHCBCFIEBBAEPLCCAA.dan@netrail.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0106291018100.30571-100000@minot.kruckenberg.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
I'm not sure that's a simple question. Actually, relatively few peers
require "bi-costal" connectivity. Most require 3-5 geographically diverse
connections. Some actually have "zone maps", indicating areas where you must
have at least one connection per zone. Others are happy with one eastern,
one central, and one western connections.
- Dan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu]On Behalf Of
> Pete Kruckenberg
> Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 12:19 PM
> To: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: Re: Open Peers at PAIX
>
>
>
> > Seems almost all the larger service providers are
> > requiring at least bi-costal these days.
>
> Who would be added to this list if you had bi-costal
> connectivity, with bi-costal being so inexpensive now?
>
> Pete.
>
