[39203] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Open Peers at PAIX
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christian Nielsen)
Thu Jun 28 16:00:36 2001
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 12:55:07 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christian Nielsen <cnielsen@nielsen.net>
To: "Richard A. Steenbergen" <ras@e-gerbil.net>
Cc: Pete Ashdown <pashdown@xmission.com>, <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0106281502130.29677-100000@overlord.e-gerbil.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0106281250490.16793-100000@moench.nielsen.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Richard A. Steenbergen wrote:
> These are the only large service provider networks I see listed.
> AboveNet would probably peer with a bum on the street outside PAIX if
> he could speak BGP, but AFAIK GBLX's requirements were at least 3
> locations and bi-costal at a minimium. If I remember correctly Exodus
> is also slightly picky about its "ghetto peers", probably falling
> somewhere the middle of the other two.
come on richard... you know that Exodus has an open peering policy... :)
of course, exodus has all their peering information online
http://bengi.exodus.net/external/peering.html
> Seems almost all the larger service providers are requiring at least
> bi-costal these days.
which isnt that much of a big deal today. x-country oc3s are what, 10k per
month now?
Christian
