[39171] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 - Vendor X's statement...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joe Abley)
Wed Jun 27 14:01:46 2001
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 14:00:36 -0400
From: Joe Abley <jabley@automagic.org>
To: "Richard A. Steenbergen" <ras@e-gerbil.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20010627140035.P27658@buddha.home.automagic.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0106271342320.29677-100000@overlord.e-gerbil.net>; from ras@e-gerbil.net on Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 01:43:35PM -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 01:43:35PM -0400, Richard A. Steenbergen wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 01:38:28PM -0400, Joe Abley wrote:
> > What BGP acceptance tests do people currently run against prospective
> > vendors' hardware?
>
> QA Robot
>
> http://advanced.comms.agilent.com/qarobot/
Does that expose the RFC3065 issue if you run it against vendor C's
implementations?
Joe
