[39081] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: peering requirements (Re: DDOS anecdotes)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Vixie)
Tue Jun 26 13:44:06 2001
To: nanog@merit.edu
From: Paul Vixie <vixie@mfnx.net>
Date: 26 Jun 2001 10:43:31 -0700
In-Reply-To: vixie@mfnx.net's message of "23 Jun 2001 12:09:44 -0700"
Message-ID: <g3ithjcf24.fsf@redpaul.mfnx.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Following up on my own post:
vixie@mfnx.net (Paul Vixie) writes:
> Recommendation: upgrade your peering requirements to include language like:
> ...
Several folks here talked about technical implementation aspects (RPF, etc)
and a few told me privately that peering was a sales/marketing activity at
this stage of the game.
This either means that upgrading the general level of peering agreement is
not possible, or that the people I should be discussing it with don't read
NANOG.
This echos what I learnt at Stephen's BOF in Phoenix.
