[39017] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher A. Woodfield)
Mon Jun 25 14:40:11 2001
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 14:36:36 -0400
From: "Christopher A. Woodfield" <rekoil@semihuman.com>
To: Bruce Robertson <bruce@greatbasin.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20010625143636.C16197@semihuman.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200106251823.f5PINPv11709@roo.greatbasin.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Educate me: are you not at this time billing the customer for the
local loop? Here in VZ territory, the cost of the local loop lease from VZ
and the DSLAM access from Covad (in your case, SBC provides both of
these, right?) are both rolled into the standard monthly fee from my ISP.
Is this not how it's done in SBC land?
-C
> opportunity to also sell other services over that DSL circuit, and we are
> also made responsible for billing the DSL circuit to the customer. So in
--
---------------------------
Christopher A. Woodfield rekoil@semihuman.com
PGP Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xB887618B
