[38963] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: BGP instability (was Re: Exodus Down)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alex Rubenstein)
Sun Jun 24 01:02:54 2001
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 01:06:50 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
From: Alex Rubenstein <alex@nac.net>
To: "Vivien M." <vivienm@dyndns.org>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <NDBBKECCEHKIHGIMJECACEPACJAA.vivienm@dyndns.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.WNT.4.33.0106240106190.1136-100000@neon>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> > 3. The information received via the list is considered
> > confidential information, not to be reproduced in any form
> > without prior written approval of Exodus.
>
> I hate to argue on NANOG about this, but #3 seems to me like it's an NDA
> (although a rather informal one), for all intents and purposes.
>
> In any case, #3 would be violated by posting NANOG about any information on
> that list, IMHO.
Can you really enforce a unilateral NDA assertion?
I donut think so. It'd be an interesting fight.
