[38937] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Exodus Down
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (George William Herbert)
Sat Jun 23 21:30:54 2001
Message-Id: <200106240137.SAA20313@gw.retro.com>
To: Dee McKinney <deem@wdm.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 18:37:57 -0700
From: George William Herbert <gherbert@retro.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
>This from the SuSE Linux mail list may help :-)
>>>>> Forwarded message from "Lewis E. Wolfgang" <wolfgang@nosc.mil>
>Something is definitely rotten here.
>Whois reports:
> Server Name: SLASHDOT.ORG.SUCKS.COMPARED.TO.JIMPHILLIPS.ORG
> IP Address: 24.240.60.16
> Registrar: TUCOWS, INC.
> Whois Server: whois.opensrs.net
> Referral URL: http://www.opensrs.org
>
> Domain Name: SLASHDOT.ORG
> Registrar: NETWORK SOLUTIONS, INC.
> Whois Server: whois.networksolutions.com
> Referral URL: http://www.networksolutions.com
> Name Server: NS1.ANDOVER.NET
> Name Server: NS2.ANDOVER.NET
> Updated Date: 13-jun-2001
>
>I've never seen whois report two registrars, especially one that says
>"SLASHDOT.ORG.SUCKS.COMPARED.TO.JIMPHILLIPS.ORG"
There's nothing rotten there at all. People have had the ability
to name their nameservers whatever they wanted for some time,
as long as it was one of their TLDs. There have been quite a number
of my.domain.rulez.your.domain.sux.dude.we.rule.daves.org
type nameserver names for years. Whois is just reporting
both matches (both things that contain slashdot.org in the
domain or nameserver that are in the database).
-george william herbert
gherbert@retro.com
