[38883] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IP Addresses for colocation
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Charles Sprickman)
Fri Jun 22 11:06:48 2001
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 11:06:01 -0400 (EDT)
From: Charles Sprickman <spork@inch.com>
To: "Sean M. Doran" <smd@clock.org>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>, <scheller@u1.net>
In-Reply-To: <20010622133132.63FC9C7901@cesium.clock.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.33.0106221104550.18637-100000@shell.inch.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Is it really necessary to respond to a polite question with this kind of
attitude?
Is your goal to educate other netops or just belitte people?
Charles
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Sean M. Doran wrote:
> So, it's like the DNS has totally stopped working, to the point
> where there is zero possibility of adding in new A RRs? And the
> tools that allow centralizatioin of address administration, like
> DHCP, have also broken down, I guess. I blame the Internet Software
> Consortium for people wanting to migrate _whole /24s_ instead of
> doing a renumbering exercise when they shift gear from using one
> connection to the Internet to another, since obviously their
> software (like BIND and DHCP) is horribly flawed and unusable.
>
> | Is there a better way to get a /24 that can "go anywhere"?
>
> You can pay each of the thousands of ISPs whose routing tables
> will have to carry your prefix in their routing systems... have
> you considered that? (I'll do it for 100 U.S. dollars, inquire within!)
>
> Sean.
>
