[38840] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: opinions on routers/switches for parallel clusters
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dee McKinney)
Mon Jun 18 12:59:40 2001
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 09:59:19 -0700
Message-ID: <C4FC1DF393CC91478E60979C3A1DB721C550CE@or-nocc-mail01.wciwan.com>
From: "Dee McKinney" <dmckinney@wcicable.com>
To: <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
fairly sheltered life i'd say :)
-----Original Message-----
From: Albert Meyer [mailto:albert@waller.net]
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 8:54 AM
To: Michael C . Wu; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: opinions on routers/switches for parallel clusters
Having dealt with Lucent I can warn you away from them (as if I need to=20
nowadays). Having dealt with Cabletron I can warn you away from
Riverstone.=20
The only company you mention which has consistently provided excellent=20
products and support (and never screwed me around or lied to me) is
Cisco.=20
Their stuff is a bit overpriced, but <cliche> you get what you pay for.=20
</cliche>
At 11:15 AM 6/18/01 -0500, keichii@freebsd.org wrote:
