[38834] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: standards for giving out blocks of IP addresses
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Charles Scott)
Sun Jun 17 08:22:54 2001
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 08:22:06 -0400 (EDT)
From: Charles Scott <cscott@gaslightmedia.com>
To: Joshua Goodall <joshua@roughtrade.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106170518400.29510-100000@elm.phenome.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0106170814420.28138-100000@harbor.gaslightmedia.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Joshua:
Sorry for my previous post--I should be more carefull when I'm tired. In
any case, note that I have been working from the published ARIN policies
and the quoted RFC. BTW, the link you provided lists RFC2050 as the
assignment policy for all the RIR's.
Chuck
On Sun, 17 Jun 2001, Joshua Goodall wrote:
>
> charles,
>
> what I was actually trying to convey was that the published policies are
> what you have to deal with, not the RFC, and that in particular, some RIR
> policies have diverged from 2050.
>
> I have never been employed by an RIR. I simply know/knew enough people on
> the inside of one particular RIR to know how things worked in practice.
>
> this may be of interest:
> http://www.ripe.net/ripencc/mem-services/registration/rir-comp-matrix-rev.html
>
> and I suggest you don't publicly flame private emails in future.
>
> J
>
--
