[38773] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Opinions about InterNAP
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mitch Halmu)
Wed Jun 13 14:38:17 2001
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 14:35:08 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mitch Halmu <mitch@netside.net>
To: "Seth M. Kusiak" <seth.kusiak@yours4less.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <20010613171539.15690.qmail@hex.databits.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.1010613141036.2647U-100000@sunny.netside.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Seth M. Kusiak wrote:
> It seems that InterNAP
> is perfect in our situation because they buy transit from multiple providers
> and claim to not have any black holes in their network.
>
> I hear many great things about InterNAP and I hear the opposite as well.
>
> Any thoughts would GREATLY be appreciated
If indeed they adhere to a "no black holes" policy, they are to be
commended. Who would have thought this will become a strong selling
point? Access to the whole uncensored Internet, available only from
a few select providers...
http://www.peacefire.org/stealth/group-statement.5-17-2001.html
--Mitch
NetSide
