[38701] in North American Network Operators' Group
non-op (Re: Definition of Tier-1)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (E.B. Dreger)
Mon Jun 11 09:15:08 2001
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 13:14:23 +0000 (GMT)
From: "E.B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam@noc.everquick.net>
To: Travis Pugh <tpugh@shore.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.30.0106081214330.21397-100000@stonecoast>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.20.0106111310570.17571-100000@www.everquick.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 12:16:36 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Travis Pugh <tpugh@shore.net>
>
> That sales BS is probably prompted by customers telling sales people
> that they won't buy service from anyone but a "tier 1" provider. This
> leads to many creative definitions of tier 1.
So, how firm is the "transit-free" definition? (That's what I always
thought was the proper definition, but it's been obliterated in the past
couple of years...) Firm enough to slap abusers with false advertising
suits? ;-P
Eddy
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brotsman & Dreger, Inc.
EverQuick Internet Division
Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita/(Inter)national
Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT)
From: A Trap <blacklist@brics.com>
To: blacklist@brics.com
Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature.
These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots. Do NOT
send mail to <blacklist@brics.com>, or you are likely to be blocked.
