[38608] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: /24s run amuck again
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Simon Lyall)
Fri Jun 8 05:27:49 2001
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 21:27:02 +1200 (NZST)
From: Simon Lyall <simon.lyall@ihug.co.nz>
To: "Richard A. Steenbergen" <ras@e-gerbil.net>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0106080249320.29677-100000@overlord.e-gerbil.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0106082115550.18605-100000@boggle.ihug.co.nz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Richard A. Steenbergen wrote:
> This mean over 57% of the routing table consists of /24s. So in order to
> facilitate getting this fixed, I have prepared a list of the worst
> offenders and their specific blocks which (most likely) have no reason for
> not being aggregated. If all of these entries could be aggregated (and I'm
> certain this simple script missed some), it would reduce the routing table
> by over 29,000 entries, to less the 78k. I think it's pretty obvious that
> a lot of these simply have no excuse.
>
> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras/projects/ipaddr/24amuck.txt
I'd suggest you review your data. Checking our AS (7657) you list networks
we havn't had for 6 months advertised to a peer we havn't had for 3
months.
Not to mention you don't even list a bunch of /24s we are advertising
(for various reasons (not all good)).
--
Simon Lyall. | Newsmaster | Work: simon.lyall@ihug.co.nz
Senior Network/System Admin | Postmaster | Home: simon@darkmere.gen.nz
ihug, Auckland, NZ | Asst Doorman | Web: http://www.darkmere.gen.nz
