[38536] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Self Regulation (was Re: New peering criteria)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (James Thomason)
Wed Jun 6 18:38:21 2001
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 15:28:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: James Thomason <james@divide.org>
To: "Sean M. Doran" <smd@clock.org>
Cc: vijay@umbc.edu, nanog@merit.edu, sean@donelan.com
In-Reply-To: <20010606215237.B3DF8C7901@cesium.clock.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0106061517520.27867-100000@www1>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> The answer is simple: have more lawyers than most jurisdictions
> have civil servants.
You must be a lawyer.
> Is there any serious and relevant regulatory authority which
> is going to intervene in a contractual dispute between parties
> which are NOT dominant in their industry?
There are dominant carriers in this market.
> PS - can you tell how much i hate it when vaguely technical people
> pose ex cathedra about vaguely legal & regulatory issues?
I thought the conversation was about settlement and interconnection.
Regards,
James
