[38439] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: PSI statement on C&W peering issue

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Daniel Golding)
Mon Jun 4 23:22:25 2001

From: "Daniel Golding" <dan@netrail.net>
To: "Sean Donelan" <sean@donelan.com>, <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 23:22:40 -0400
Message-ID: <CKEOJFLLKMIPKODCKHKLCEEOCBAA.dan@netrail.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <20010604233245.10203.cpmta@c004.sfo.cp.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


Sean,

10% may be high. It's only about 2700 routes from what I can see.

- Daniel Golding

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu]On Behalf Of
> Sean Donelan
> Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 7:33 PM
> To: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: PSI statement on C&W peering issue
> 
> 
> 
> PSI statement from their website
> 
>       Cable & Wireless chose to terminate connectivity with       
>       PSINet on 2June01.  Over 90% of the traffic that used to be 
>       routed through C&W is now being routed via other means      
>       through our robust global free peering infrastructure.  The 
>       remaining 10% or so represents C&W customers that have been 
>       deliberately cut off from PSINet by C&W.  While PSINet is   
>       ready and willing to re-establish connectivity with C&W at  
>       any time, it is up to C&W to choose to reverse their        
>       previous decision.  In the meantime, PSINet can offer       
>      services directly to those C&W customers that are affected. 
> 
> http://www.psi.net/cgi-bin/netstatus.pl5
> 
> 
> Does the 10% number mean C&W's network reach has shrunk, or that a
> growing number of networks are multihomed?
> 
> 
> 

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post