[38431] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: C&W Peering
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Eric Gauthier)
Mon Jun 4 20:39:58 2001
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 20:40:34 -0400
From: Eric Gauthier <eric@roxanne.org>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20010604204034.A18256@roxanne.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <NDBBKECCEHKIHGIMJECAGELICJAA.vivienm@dyndns.org>; from vivienm@dyndns.org on Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 07:58:57PM -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> Is this the part where the people (eg: Exodus, AboveNet are the two I can
> think of immediately) who were forced to get themselves some transit because
> PSI wouldn't peer with them anymore go and laugh at the irony of C&W pulling
> a PSI on PSI themselves?
I don't know about Abovenet, but when things when down between Exodus and
PSI, my impression was that Exodus just got Sprint to carry the traffic.
No new circuits, just a new path, and not a big deal because it was small
amount of traffic (rumored to be <90Mb).
Eric :)
