[38419] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: C&W Peering
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Matt Levine)
Mon Jun 4 18:50:07 2001
From: "Matt Levine" <matt@deliver3.com>
To: "'Scott Patterson'" <scottp@netrail.net>,
"'Kevin Loch'" <kloch@opnsys.com>, <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 18:53:22 -0400
Message-ID: <000001c0ed49$2832fe80$0100a8c0@exile>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <FPENJCCBJKPHKLKBDGILMEOADPAA.scottp@netrail.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> You must first know what a route table is before you can measure
> such a thing. The only thing they saw were the dollar signs they
> "thought" they would bring in. Exactly what happens when finance
> runs your peering department and the engineers don't have
> anything to say about it.
Did they really think that PSI, of all carriers, would be in a
position to start BUYING transit? Yeesh..
__
Matt Levine
@Home <matt@deliver3.com>
@Work <matt@eldosales.com> - http://www.easynews.com
PGP Public Key (0x6C0D04CF):
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6C0D04CF
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On
> Behalf Of Scott Patterson
> Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 6:42 PM
> To: Kevin Loch; nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: RE: C&W Peering
>
>
>
> > Did C&W consider the route table effects of this new
> > routing policy?
> >
>
> You must first know what a route table is before you can measure
> such a thing. The only thing they saw were the dollar signs they
> "thought" they would bring in. Exactly what happens when finance
> runs your peering department and the engineers don't have
> anything to say about it.
>
>
> -Scott
>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBOxwRYcp0j1NsDQTPEQJhtACgtX3z9OhIBksLu5dBfRN8Y+NiHAwAoMSe
WgFg+f09fwH2zQn/EoYUPuDz
=qVkt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
