[38417] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: C&W Peering
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Scott Patterson)
Mon Jun 4 18:42:28 2001
From: "Scott Patterson" <scottp@netrail.net>
To: "Kevin Loch" <kloch@opnsys.com>, <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 18:41:46 -0400
Message-ID: <FPENJCCBJKPHKLKBDGILMEOADPAA.scottp@netrail.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <3B1C0B09.1522C4F@opnsys.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> Did C&W consider the route table effects of this new
> routing policy?
>
You must first know what a route table is before you can measure
such a thing. The only thing they saw were the dollar signs they
"thought" they would bring in. Exactly what happens when finance
runs your peering department and the engineers don't have
anything to say about it.
-Scott
