[38362] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: 95th Percentile = Lame
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Mon Jun 4 00:27:38 2001
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Joe Blanchard <jblanchard@wyse.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Message-Id: <E156lwc-000FTe-00@rip.psg.com>
Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2001 21:26:22 -0700
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> In reading this thread. Does this mean that if I send an 0xFFFF bit pattern
> to a network versus a 0x0000 pattern I'd be charged more for the energy
> consumption since all the 1's are high and consume more elecetric
no, it's the transitions from 0 to 1 or vice versa that take the energy.
that's why the nanog list is so repetitive, saves money.
randy
