[38311] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W Peering Problem?)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jim Mercer)
Sun Jun 3 09:49:30 2001
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 09:49:01 -0400
From: Jim Mercer <jim@reptiles.org>
To: Joe Abley <jabley@automagic.org>
Cc: "Richard A. Steenbergen" <ras@e-gerbil.net>,
Timothy Brown <tcb@ga.prestige.net>, nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20010603094900.N9538@reptiles.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20010602235833.N21377@buddha.home.automagic.org>; from jabley@automagic.org on Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 11:58:33PM -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 11:58:33PM -0400, Joe Abley wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 11:37:56PM -0400, Jim Mercer wrote:
> > we've since moved to cisco, and, well, now i have cache flow stats which
> > are parsed into customer subnets.
>
> How do you bill? Per byte, flat-rate, some measurement of rate, or other?
i have the ability to do per-byte or 95th percentile.
most customers are 95th percentile.
--
[ Jim Mercer jim@reptiles.org +1 416 410-5633 ]
[ Now with more and longer words for your reading enjoyment. ]
